oxfordhacker: (Default)
[personal profile] oxfordhacker
I blame [livejournal.com profile] damiancugley. At work once - whether apropos of nothing or inspired by seeing me - he said, "You know in Star Trek when they go back in time to the late 20th century, and they dress in period costume, and it's always perfect? That never rang true. It would be much more realistic if they wore stuff that looked reasonable at first glance but, on closer examination, was all a bit uncoordinated and didn't quite fit because the computer that designed the costume didn't quite get it."

Since that day, when I catch a glimpse of myself reflected in the windows at work (typically resplendent in unlaced army boots, black cord jeans, coloured shirt and dinner jacket) I don't think, "I really need to either get some proper work clothes or stop trying", I think "Yeah! 24th century retro, baby!"

Date: 2007-01-07 10:38 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] shepline.livejournal.com
I thought Poirot was 50s?

Date: 2007-01-07 11:47 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] brixtonbrood.livejournal.com
He spans a large time span, I think the last one was published in the seventies, but the TV adaptations tend to stick with the classic 30's look, in which everyone in the world has completely contemporary Art Deco interiors.
Looks great mind you.

Profile

oxfordhacker: (Default)
oxfordhacker

August 2017

S M T W T F S
  12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728 293031  

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Dec. 24th, 2025 11:52 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios